He Weifang: watching football, like the rule of law, _ Hiroshi chats about GE Home

(Greeting old before class) watching football , rule of law guests on: he Weifang, famous Jurists. Main point: the same with football match, the rule of law in the judge's neutrality, judgment of finality is vital. Without these, the football match to achieve equitable, rule of law in a fair and progressive similarly was empty. Jurists he Weifang: watching football, like the rule of law once every four years the World Cup has finally ended, fans of joy or sorrow can also come to an end. In fact, in addition to feel the charm of football itself, a concern also because professional and intellectual background of difference, from football, see something different. From a legal point of view football, quite worthy of some reasonable. said Sport has a very similar with court proceedings. Because both sides seek to win the competition, you need to set fair rules of the game. Where the referee's neutrality is essential. A famous law saying: no one shall not involve their own interests act as judge in the case. This also applies to the football game. In a State of the League, to avoid selecting the place from Club; magistrate in international competitions, of course, nor may persons by the game state. referee Moreover, the interests of the Association of exclusion but also some more complex details, such as potential competitors of the evasive, etc. World Cup and even political factors relating to the international. Korea and Brazil between competition, if the specified from United States magistrate may be controversial, like Argentina and Germany's game, it is not advisable to arrange United Kingdom human law enforcement. It is worth noting that, in our legal system design, the arbiter of neutrality is completely ignored. The existing justice system fully coincide with the Administrative Division, the Court in the place of interest and, in the decision in favor of the intricate on had to be subject to local power. In the vast majority of cases, the parties could not freely select a neutral referee. Therefore, Yang case can only be heard in Shanghai; Li Zhuang case not escape Chongqing ground. Economic disputes or in court, or in each other's Court, the Court also has as its primary, and impartial justice is rare. In the seat of the Government involved citizens suing the administrative procedure, the results of such an arrangement can be devastating. You can think of a subject to the local party and Government's judiciary can maintain basic neutrality and impartiality? football matches and the judicial process is also important to compare to the referee's finality. In Germany and England in England would have driven the equaliser in a ball, on-site video playback display fast the ball across the goal line distance is a striking difference between. But the referee simply not sentenced to score. If convicted of scoring, England morale, the outcome is not known yet. Afterwards, the FIFA President Brad errors for the referee to England to apologize, but it cannot be changed. Many fans for this error is obvious but unrepentant approach was dissatisfied with many people called for the introduction of high-tech means to reduce errors in judgment. In fact, FIFA is a profound implication of the system. If the referees in the match field of the judgment can be made after the fact by some sort of "authority" be changed, then the referee's authority would hurt competition forces will exacerbate the non-institutional rivalry game. Is one can avoid the error; you cannot guarantee that the subsequent Commission decision 100% correct. Moreover than in full view of the umpire, the Committee of the running process is more likely to become a black-box in action. Unable to do so perfect premise, we had to take on different institutional arrangements between pros and cons and make trade-offs and choices. In my opinion, the maintenance of finality magistrate's decision is more reasonable. In contrast, China's judicial decisions of finality it is gone. For a long time, we believe in the so-called "realistic" principle, to advocate the "wrong" must be correct. No matter what level of court judgment, including the size of the "error", error occurs because of a judicial officer's mistake or because a party's own reason, forklift. This original design lead to good results is shaking the entire system stability and comprehensive loss of judicial authority. Earlier, we do not pursue the neutrality of the judicial role and the referee process of prudential and transparency, and set the various ways that motivate people to try to overturn the judgment has entered into force. Because of the possibility of Cassation, so there is always a losing to pay enormous efforts to overturn the decision. When the target implementation, the prevailing party and become a failure, of course, he can then try to overthrow the new judgment. Thus, the road, right to the door of the call sign, interviewers choking in Imperial, local officials near the enemy on the provincial road ... Because the actual ability to overturn decisions of the situation, resulting in the "old wounds, scars," adds new, eventually complained, and even resentment. In ancient Rome that adage perhaps worth pondering: "absolute justice, is the absolute injustice." Every time I look at the World Cup, Korea, Japan these neighbours in this arena have performances, are inevitably Chinese football. Why such a great country but always wandering outside the door, only entered once, and also in the group is carrying a basket of eggs in the wind? apart from football technology itself, whether certain factors in the system so that our football standards it is difficult to raise? for example fans, although some people like to say that we have the best fans, but to be honest, our fans, maybe the world's most easily pulled out of a group. Whether club tournaments or competitions between national teams, are common in AMS and conceding only after fans cheer for the other players. Remember Sun jihai, Zheng, play football players abroad are exclamation have AMS fans team of loyalty, and even pass on generations of fans. Last season sees the final round of competition, Herta Berlin has been degraded before, but we live at home you see when you full House, in the most difficult time, fans and team firmly together. Here, again, perhaps long ago abandoned, fans of the public gallery scattered over several fans still abuse the AMS. Fans for a team of loyal whether such as a State land system? when we don't have the rightsFor the home countries of love lost, that at no time does not leave no sentiment became impossible to safeguard, it is difficult to produce and maintain. (He Weifang) this article source: "Sohu sports" http://news.sohu.com/20100712/n273446835.shtml